International declarations & Covenants

India is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966
Article 17 of the said covenant is as under:-
1. No one shall be subject to arbitrary unlawful interference with his privacy family, human or correspondence, nor to lawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.”
 And Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 Article 12 states that
“No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks”.

Problems in dealing with customers

One of the major problems with companies and freelancers is their attitude towards their customers. The customers are paying you, it is their hard earned money and if the quality of the product or service is poor, or you do not treat the customer properly, they can always take their business elsewhere. For some time, they may work with you, but it affects the long term relationship. Remember, you can never force any person to trust you. Trust is earned over a period of time.

Phone tapping

Judicial pronouncement about Phone tapping
In PUCLvs Union of India (Air1997SC568) also known as “Phone Tapping Case” the Supreme Court has held that telephone tapping is a grave invasion of an individual’s right to privacy. The state shall not resort to phone tapping unless called upon by public emergency or public safety .It was expressed by the court  that in this era of highly sophisticated communication technology usage, the privacy of  an individual is at stake and susceptible to abuse.    

Google, tata , NTRo, CBI, R&AW, indian intelligence agencies are allegedly involved in a major fraud falsely claim that 10 lazy greedy google, tata sponsored goan call girls., cheater housewives and other fraud indian intelligence employees dwho never answered JEE have the btech 1993 ee degree, resume, investment of a single woman obc engineer, google competitor,india’s largest female domain investor .
Goa’s top frauds are the google, tata sponsored section 420 fraud R&AW/CBI employees goan gsb fraud 2012 diploma holder siddhi mandrekar, goan gsb fraud housewife extortionist riddhi nayak who looks like actress kangana ranaut, slim goan obc bhandari call girl sunaina chodnekar 2013 bsc who never answered JEE, got a btech 1993 ee degree, yet have got fraud ntro officials like puneet j, j srinivasan , vijay, to falsely claim that these goan conwomen were their btech 1993 ee classmate to divert and steal all the correspondence of a obc single woman engineer to these goan frauds and other cheater R&AW employees nayanshree hathwar, mba hr ruchika.
Goa’s top GSB FRAUD fraud riddhi nayak was ONLY INTERESTED IN GETTING MARRIED not in studying engineering, yet the shameless liar goan GSB FRAUD MAFIA OF CARO, MANDREKAR, NAYAK falsely claim that google, tata shameless GOAN GSB FRAUD cheater has a btech 1993 ee degree of a obc single woman engineer (who these goan gsb frauds are defaming) to give the goan gsb fraud riddhi nayak great powers, a cbi job WITH FAKE RESUME, monthly salary.
Ad for ntro employees puneet, j srinivasan involved in stealing their classmates resume

This is a clear case of BRAHMIN ATROCITIES in india as mediocre lazy goan gsb fraud women like riddhi nayak, siddhi mandrekar do not answer JEE , yet managed to steal the resume, including btech 1993 ee degree of a obc single woman engineer to get R&AW/CBI jobs with fake resume

Privacy

Privacy is described as the state and condition of being free from public attention, being free from unsanctioned intrusion, exercising will to reveal and conceal by choice. The word privacy can accommodate a very broad meaning because of its subjective nature.

‘Privacy’ as a subject does not find an exclusive space under any of the Lists mentioned in the constitution of India .As a result an independent statute making right to privacy enforceable under Indian law is yet to take shape .Nevertheless the framers of the constitution have in spirit protected right to privacy vide fundamental rights in Part III of the Constitution. The safeguards to protect privacy of individuals against the State have largely come about as a set of guidelines in the form of judicial pronouncements .The ambit of Article 21, (protection of life & personal liberty) under Right to Freedom, has been expanded so as to protect the right to privacy.